Exponential Comparison of Three Four and Five

#hsc-maths#proofs#medium

In this problem we investigate an exponential inequality that blends algebra with calculus. It tests your ability to prove or disprove existence statements—a core skill in HSC Extension 1 and 2—and introduces the powerful technique of dividing by the largest term to transform a comparison. By working through the solution, you’ll see how a single numerical example can settle an existence question, while deeper analysis reveals the full picture and shows that the inequality holds for all real numbers beyond a critical point.

Problem Statement

Prove or disprove: There exists a real number nn such that 3n+4n<5n3^n + 4^n < 5^n.


Hints

The statement is true. Try a few values: n=2n = 2 gives 9+16=25=529 + 16 = 25 = 5^2 (equality, not <<).

Try n=3n = 3: Is 33+43<533^3 + 4^3 < 5^3? Calculate 27+6427 + 64 vs 125125.

Alternatively, divide by 5n5^n to get (3/5)n+(4/5)n<1(3/5)^n + (4/5)^n < 1 and analyze the function behavior.


Solutions

The statement is true.

Proof by Example:

To prove that such a real number exists, we only need to find one value of nn that works. From the hint, we know n=2n=2 gives equality, so we can test the next convenient integer. Let's try n=3n=3:

33+43=27+64=9153=125\begin{aligned} 3^3 + 4^3 &= 27 + 64 = 91 \\ 5^3 &= 125 \end{aligned}

Since 91<12591 < 125, the inequality 33+43<533^3 + 4^3 < 5^3 holds.

Therefore, n=3n = 3 is a real number satisfying the inequality. \blacksquare

Alternative Proof (Analysis):

We now want to understand for exactly which nn the inequality is true. A clever first step is to divide through by the dominant term 5n5^n, which transforms the inequality into a sum of fractions that are each less than 1.

Divide the inequality by 5n5^n:

(35)n+(45)n<1\left(\frac{3}{5}\right)^n + \left(\frac{4}{5}\right)^n < 1

Let f(n)=(35)n+(45)nf(n) = \left(\frac{3}{5}\right)^n + \left(\frac{4}{5}\right)^n.

  • At n=2n = 2: f(2)=925+1625=1f(2) = \frac{9}{25} + \frac{16}{25} = 1 (equality)
  • To see how f(n)f(n) behaves beyond n=2n=2, we examine its derivative:

The derivative: f(n)=(35)nln(35)+(45)nln(45)f'(n) = \left(\frac{3}{5}\right)^n \ln\left(\frac{3}{5}\right) + \left(\frac{4}{5}\right)^n \ln\left(\frac{4}{5}\right)

Since 35<1\frac{3}{5} < 1 and 45<1\frac{4}{5} < 1, both logarithms are negative, so f(n)<0f'(n) < 0.

  • Therefore, f(n)f(n) is strictly decreasing.

Since f(2)=1f(2) = 1 and ff is strictly decreasing, for any n>2n > 2, we have f(n)<1f(n) < 1.

Thus, the inequality holds for all n>2n > 2. In particular, it holds for n=3n = 3 (and infinitely many other values). \blacksquare

Note: This shows the power of the "divide by largest term" technique in inequality problems. The critical point is n=2n = 2 where equality holds (Pythagorean triple: 32+42=523^2 + 4^2 = 5^2).


Takeaways

  • For an existence proof, a single concrete counterexample (like n=3n=3) is enough—you don’t need to find all solutions.
  • The “divide by the largest term” trick transforms an exponential comparison into a sum of fractions less than 1, making monotonic behaviour easier to analyze.
  • Recognising when a function is strictly decreasing (via the derivative) reveals the full range of solutions: here, all n>2n>2, with equality at the critical n=2n=2—the familiar 33-44-55 Pythagorean triple.

Further Readings

If you found this proof interesting, be sure to check out these relevant HSC booklets to sharpen your reasoning skills: HSC Proofs, HSC Last Resorts, HSC Trigonometry

Written by Vu Hung Nguyen

Mathematics Educator · LinkedIn · About