The Pigeonhole Principle and Leading Digits
One of the most enchanting aspects of the Extension 2 syllabus is how the humble Pigeonhole Principle can be paired with logarithms to answer questions that feel almost magical—like proving a power of 2 must someday begin with the digits 2025. In this problem we’ll journey through fractional parts, irrational rotations, and a continuous pigeonhole argument to build a rigorous proof from the ground up.
Problem Statement
For any real number , the fractional part of is denoted by and is defined as , where is the greatest integer less than or equal to . Note that .
For example, , .
(i) Show that for any positive integer , the ordinary decimal representation of begins with the digits (i.e., ) if and only if:
(ii) Let be an irrational number. Prove that for any two distinct integers and , the fractional parts and must be strictly distinct.
(iii) Let be a positive integer. By dividing the interval into equal subintervals, use the Pigeonhole Principle to prove that there exists a positive integer such that:
(iv) Given that is an irrational number, let
By choosing an integer such that , or otherwise, deduce that there exists at least one positive integer such that begins with the digits .
Hints
- (i) Write in scientific notation: . If the number starts with 2025, what is bounded between? Take the base-10 logarithm.
- (ii) Proof by contradiction. Assume . Expand using the definition and isolate .
- (iii) Consider the fractional parts . Place these "pigeons" into the "holes" (subintervals).
- (iv) Think of the interval as a target of width . Part (iii) guarantees a "step size" strictly smaller than . Can consecutive steps jump over the target without landing inside it?
Solutions
Part (i): We begin by writing in scientific notation. Because the number starts with the digits 2025, its significant part must satisfy . So for some integer and . Taking base‑10 logarithms of both sides yields . Since , we must have and . Substituting this into the inequality for yields the required result.
Part (ii): We prove this by contradiction, a natural tool when a statement about irrationality is involved. Assume for integers . Then , which implies
The numerator is an integer and the denominator is a non‑zero integer, so this forces to be rational—contradicting the premise. Thus, the fractional parts must be distinct.
Part (iii): We now partition the continuous interval into equal subintervals of width . From part (ii), the values are strictly distinct. By the Pigeonhole Principle, with pigeons and holes, at least two of these fractional parts, say and with , must fall in the same subinterval. Hence . Now observe that
lies in , so it is exactly the fractional part . Setting (where ) gives .
Part (iv): We now bring all the earlier pieces together. Since is a positive number, we can choose an integer large enough that . From part (iii) we obtain a positive integer such that the “step size” satisfies . Consider the multiples of this step: . Because is strictly smaller than the width of the target interval , some multiple must eventually fall inside that interval. Consequently satisfies the bounds required by part (i). Letting proves the existence of a power of starting with .
Takeaways
- Kronecker's Theorem: This problem is a guided proof demonstrating that the orbit of an irrational rotation is dense. It guarantees that by doubling a number enough times, you can eventually generate a power of 2 that starts with any sequence of digits you desire.
- The Continuous Pigeonhole: By dividing a continuous number line into physical subintervals, we can force infinite irrational sequences to behave predictably.